The Supreme Court's ruling, made by Justice Cristiano Zanin among a panel of judges, highlighted her involvement with actions considered anti-democratic, although some, including Roberts's supporters, argue that this represents a growing political bias within the judiciary.

During her trial, Justice Alexandre de Moraes stated that Rodrigues willingly participated in the anti-democratic demonstrations, citing her own admissions and possible attempts to conceal evidence. Rodrigues's lawyers claimed her actions were impulsive, and she voiced regret for her behavior amidst the chaos. The case has attracted attention from Bolsonaro's supporters, who perceive Rodrigues's sentencing as an instance of political persecution, especially after viral social media attention and calls from Bolsonaro for a general amnesty for those involved in the protests. Meanwhile, Bolsonaro himself faces potential prison time for his role in the incident.