Skip to main content
WorldVoice 360
PoliticsSierra Leone

Trump Administration Issues Controversial Survey to International Researchers

Government seeks disclosures on connections to "hostile" entities affecting funding approvals

By Sheryl Gay Stolberg and Apoorva MandavilliSource: nytimes.com1 min read
Trump Administration Issues Controversial Survey to International Researchers
Image via nytimes.com

In brief

The Trump administration's latest move has stirred concerns among international researchers as it tightens scrutiny on overseas collaborations.

The Trump administration has recently circulated a politically charged questionnaire to researchers and organizations operating internationally, demanding disclosures of any ties to entities perceived as hostile, such as "communist, socialist or totalitarian parties." This survey, which came to light through The New York Times, targets groups involved in vital health research, including studies related to diseases like HIV and public health system enhancements. Recipients include organizations that have received funding from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the United States Agency for International Development (USAID). The questionnaire, ominously titled “Foreign Assistance Review,” mirrors an earlier version dispatched to USAID partners, which have seen drastic cuts under the current administration. Researchers were given a tight 48-hour window to submit their responses, leading to anxiety among recipients about potential repercussions. Some grantees expressed concerns that providing answers deemed unfavorable could jeopardize their funding. The questionnaire distinctly articulates the administration's stance, asserting that taxpayer funds should not support regimes that undermine free enterprise or intervene in the affairs of other nations. It emphasizes a vision for America that prioritizes domestic growth and innovation, minimizing reliance on foreign aid. As discussions surrounding globalization and collaboration intensify, this move is likely to provoke further debate about the implications for scientific research and international relations under the Trump administration.

Topics

More on this story