Social media echoed with sentiments of disapproval, framing the ban as sexist and paternalistic. The director's controversial political background—his former association with the ruling anti-colonial party, Pastef—fueled fears that personal ideologies may infiltrate public institutions. Political analyst Fatoumata Ba described the situation as a larger struggle for identity imposed by state power over dissenting voices. Pioneering feminist thinker Henriette Niang Kandé underscored the practical considerations behind hair choices in a viral post, arguing for aesthetic freedom.

While some supporters viewed Guèye's initiative as a drive towards cultural pride, critics asserted that it risked misrepresenting cultural identity by concentrating solely on appearances. Sociologist Mame Diarra Thiam articulated that true affirmation of African identity should focus on broader systemic issues like education and economic justice rather than enforcing superficial bans.

As pressure mounted, the ban was rescinded the following day, with Guèye attributing the decision to public misunderstanding of his intentions. Nevertheless, the fallout has highlighted discontent, particularly among urban youth and progressive circles, regarding the government's increasing conservatism. The short-lived ban served as a catalyst for a much deeper debate surrounding cultural authenticity, gender equality, and personal freedom in Senegal, with themes of post-colonial identity and systemic injustices remaining relevant in the public discourse.