ORLANDO, Fla. (AP) — New evidence has emerged that federal and state officials withheld crucial information regarding the funding of Florida's 'Alligator Alcatraz,' an immigration detention facility situated in the Everglades. Environmental groups, which are currently suing to close the facility, assert that documents obtained through public records requests reveal discussions about federal reimbursement as early as June. This new insight follows a recent ruling where a federal appellate court allowed the facility to remain open, citing arguments from Florida and the Trump administration that reimbursement applications had not been filed.
In a twist, emails show that the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) acknowledged receiving a grant application from state officials in August, resulting in a subsequent $608 million approval for the facility's expenses. 'We now know that the federal and state government had records confirming that they closely partnered on this facility from the beginning but failed to disclose them to the district court,' said Tania Galloni, an attorney representing the environmental plaintiffs.
Earlier, a Miami federal judge mandated the facility to decrease operations within a two-month timeframe due to the absence of an environmental impact review, thereby implying that reimbursement had already been decided. As the case unfolds, environmental activists argue that the new evidence must be assessed to determine the facility's future, while Florida's Department of Emergency Management has yet to respond to inquiries about these developments. The Everglades center, opened amidst Florida's push for stricter immigration policies, continues to face multiple legal challenges, including claims of operating beyond the scope of federal law and the lawyer-client confidentiality issues threatening detainee rights.
In a twist, emails show that the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) acknowledged receiving a grant application from state officials in August, resulting in a subsequent $608 million approval for the facility's expenses. 'We now know that the federal and state government had records confirming that they closely partnered on this facility from the beginning but failed to disclose them to the district court,' said Tania Galloni, an attorney representing the environmental plaintiffs.
Earlier, a Miami federal judge mandated the facility to decrease operations within a two-month timeframe due to the absence of an environmental impact review, thereby implying that reimbursement had already been decided. As the case unfolds, environmental activists argue that the new evidence must be assessed to determine the facility's future, while Florida's Department of Emergency Management has yet to respond to inquiries about these developments. The Everglades center, opened amidst Florida's push for stricter immigration policies, continues to face multiple legal challenges, including claims of operating beyond the scope of federal law and the lawyer-client confidentiality issues threatening detainee rights.
