WASHINGTON (AP) — In a significant ruling, a federal judge has allowed the nearly finished Revolution Wind project to proceed, marking a setback for President Donald Trump’s administration, which has actively sought to impose restrictions on the growing offshore wind industry.
The Revolution Wind project, set to supply power to approximately 350,000 homes across Rhode Island and Connecticut, faced a work stoppage since August 22. This halt was ordered by the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management due to unspecified national security concerns, which both the project developer and the states of Connecticut and Rhode Island have contested in federal court.
Judge Royce Lamberth stated during the proceedings that the ongoing delays were costing $2.3 million per day and highlighted the precarious position of the project, which relies on the availability of a specialized construction vessel that won't be free again until 2028 if the deadlines are not met. The project is currently 80% complete, with over 1,000 workers involved.
“There is no question in my mind of irreparable harm to the plaintiffs,” Lamberth expressed, acknowledging the urgency of the situation. He concluded that the Revolution Wind project had shown a strong likelihood of success in its case and that the injunction was in the public interest.
Following the ruling, a spokesperson for the Interior Department indicated that construction could resume while the investigation into national security implications continues. Meanwhile, the developer, Danish energy company Orsted, pledged to collaborate with the administration to address any concerns raised.
Nancy Pyne from the Sierra Club criticized the previous administration's attempts to undermine clean energy initiatives. Additionally, Democratic officials in Connecticut and Rhode Island hailed the ruling as a major victory for workers and families as they seek to stabilize energy costs.
Despite this setback, Trump has vowed to pursue policies favoring fossil fuels and intends to terminate renewable energy projects in favor of traditional energy sources that emit higher greenhouse gases.
As discussions around renewable energy and climate change continue, the outcome of this case could have lasting implications for future offshore wind projects in the U.S.
