Judgment Day for Media Monopoly: Antigua & Barbuda's Sovereign Stand

The Syndicate, the Media Monopoly, and Restitution Before the ECSC

Executive Summary
On October 10, 2025, before Justice Rene Williams and the Supreme Court of the Eastern Caribbean, the case Antigua & Barbuda v. The Media Cartel (ECSC Case No. ANUHCV2025/0149) will reach its moment of judgment.

What began as Alki David v. David Boies et al. has escalated into a sovereign showdown, backed by the Government of Antigua and Barbuda, with international legal ramifications spanning London, the United States, Switzerland, and Greece.

This dossier consolidates the evidence, murders, attacks, networks, and proceedings that define this historic case.

The attacks escalated to sovereign levels, targeting the Government of Antigua and Barbuda. Prime Minister Gaston Browne’s government aligned with Ambassador-at-Large for the Green Economy, Alki David, who was recognized by the court as Sheriff Litigant of Public Interest. Attorney General Steadroy “Cutie” Benjamin was appointed amicus curiae.

Case Evolution
The proceedings began as Alki David v. David Boies et al., exposing misconduct by Hollywood power lawyers and their cartel allies. Parallel proceedings are ongoing in London before Justice Cotter in Kahn v. David, and in the United States District Court for Maryland under RICO statutes.

International Front: London, U.S., Switzerland, and Greece
The cartel faces a multi-jurisdictional reckoning with cases set in Antigua & Barbuda, London, and the United States, where default judgments have already been entered against key figures.

Defendants in Default
Individuals such as Shari Redstone and Gloria Allred remain in contempt as they face serious allegations within this expansive case. The case is defined by a historic opportunity for Antigua to reclaim sovereignty and seek reparations.

Conclusion
This is not merely a lawsuit; it stands as a reckoning with a century-old syndicate accused of stealing labor, intellectual property, and lives. The upcoming judgment signifies a crucial moment in this long-fought battle against media monopolies.