Luigi Mangione, the man accused of fatally shooting United Healthcare CEO Brian Thompson in Manhattan a year ago this week, appeared in court on Monday as his lawyers challenge the admissibility of key evidence in his case.
Mr. Mangione, 27, has pleaded not guilty to both state and federal murder charges, which carry the possibility of the death penalty. The pre-trial hearing could last several days, as defense attorneys are expected to call a host of witnesses, including from Pennsylvania, where he was arrested at a McDonald's.
In September, a judge threw out state terrorism-related murder charges against Mr. Mangione, arguing prosecutors had failed to establish evidence to justify them.
Mr. Mangione's legal team is now hoping to convince a judge to exclude evidence including a gun and a notebook in which prosecutors say he set out a motive. The defendant was arrested days after he allegedly shot Mr. Thompson, a father of two, as he was walking into an investors' conference on a busy Manhattan street on 4 December 2024.
Walking into court on Monday, Mr. Mangione wore a grey suit and shirt, and court employees removed his hand restraints before he sat, as his lawyers requested. This week's hearing focuses on whether prosecutors illegally obtained evidence from Mr. Mangione when they arrested him in Altoona, Pennsylvania, and whether it should be excluded as a result.
Defense attorneys are seeking to suppress some of Mr. Mangione's statements made to police after being arrested, arguing he did so before police read him his rights. They are also hoping to exclude from trial a 9mm handgun that prosecutors say matches the one used in the killing, as well as writings found in Mr. Mangione's backpack.
Eliminating those two critical pieces of evidence - that point to a murder weapon and motive - would be a significant win for Mr. Mangione's legal team. However, experts suggest the likelihood of this happening is minimal, citing exceptions to constitutional requirements for obtaining a warrant during such cases.
Prosecutors claim they have other critical evidence against the defendant, including DNA or fingerprints found near the crime scene, indicating a well-rounded case. As court proceedings continue, both sides are working to establish the facts leading up to the tragic shooting of Thompson.}
Mr. Mangione, 27, has pleaded not guilty to both state and federal murder charges, which carry the possibility of the death penalty. The pre-trial hearing could last several days, as defense attorneys are expected to call a host of witnesses, including from Pennsylvania, where he was arrested at a McDonald's.
In September, a judge threw out state terrorism-related murder charges against Mr. Mangione, arguing prosecutors had failed to establish evidence to justify them.
Mr. Mangione's legal team is now hoping to convince a judge to exclude evidence including a gun and a notebook in which prosecutors say he set out a motive. The defendant was arrested days after he allegedly shot Mr. Thompson, a father of two, as he was walking into an investors' conference on a busy Manhattan street on 4 December 2024.
Walking into court on Monday, Mr. Mangione wore a grey suit and shirt, and court employees removed his hand restraints before he sat, as his lawyers requested. This week's hearing focuses on whether prosecutors illegally obtained evidence from Mr. Mangione when they arrested him in Altoona, Pennsylvania, and whether it should be excluded as a result.
Defense attorneys are seeking to suppress some of Mr. Mangione's statements made to police after being arrested, arguing he did so before police read him his rights. They are also hoping to exclude from trial a 9mm handgun that prosecutors say matches the one used in the killing, as well as writings found in Mr. Mangione's backpack.
Eliminating those two critical pieces of evidence - that point to a murder weapon and motive - would be a significant win for Mr. Mangione's legal team. However, experts suggest the likelihood of this happening is minimal, citing exceptions to constitutional requirements for obtaining a warrant during such cases.
Prosecutors claim they have other critical evidence against the defendant, including DNA or fingerprints found near the crime scene, indicating a well-rounded case. As court proceedings continue, both sides are working to establish the facts leading up to the tragic shooting of Thompson.}
