Skip to main content
WorldVoice 360
PoliticsUnited States (Minnesota)

ICE Agent Charged After Alleged Deception in Venezuelan Migrant Shooting

ICE agent Christian Castro charged with lying about a non‑fatal shooting of a Venezuelan migrant during Minnesota's Operation Metro Surge.

Source: bbc.co.uk1 min read
ICE Agent Charged After Alleged Deception in Venezuelan Migrant Shooting
Image via bbc.co.uk

In brief

In a high‑profile misconduct case, ICE officer Christian Castro has been federally indicted for lying about the circumstances surrounding a January 14 shooting of Venezuelan migrant Alfredo Alejandro Aljorna, who survived a leg injury. The Department of Homeland Security originally claimed Castro acted in self‑defence after an alleged assault; investigators now allege the agent fired through a closed front door, striking a passing individual. Despite a temporary arrest in Texas and subsequent release, Minnesota prosecutors say the state's charges will continue to progress independent of the federal inquiry.

ICE agent Christian Castro faces a federal indictment for lying about his role in a non‑fatal January shooting of Venezuelan migrant Alfredo Alejandro Aljorna in Minnesota. The agent, who was part of the federal Operation Metro Surge, is accused of firing through a closed front door, striking Aljorna in the leg, contrary to Homeland Security’s claim of self‑defence after an alleged assault by migrants.

Federal authorities allege Castro reported that he fired to defend himself after attackers struck him with a shovel and broom handle, but investigators found video evidence contradicting this narrative.

Although the agent was recently released from custody after a Texas extradition request was denied, Minnesota’s chief prosecutor Keith Ellison confirmed that the state’s assault and false‑reporting charges will advance regardless of the federal indictment.

Castro’s case highlights growing scrutiny of ICE agents’ conduct, with the department ending administrative leave for officers once their statements were deemed “untruthful.” The controversy adds to ongoing nationwide debate over the role and oversight of federal immigration enforcement.

Topics

More on this story