WASHINGTON (AP) — Members of the National Guard recently deployed to Washington, D.C. are donning gloves and gathering supplies to clean up local parks, marking their 119th beautification project since being called to duty in August.

The initiative follows President Trump’s controversial federal law enforcement intervention, aimed at combating perceived crime increases. The Guard has focused its efforts on community improvements, including restoring recreation centers and supporting literacy programs in underserved areas.

Despite their efforts, the presence of armed troops in the city has raised significant concern among residents. Many fear it represents an overreach of presidential power, while others recognize the necessity of their assistance.

Community members like Sabir Abdul, 68, expressed relief at the Guard's involvement, saying, They have lives, but now they are here, helping us.” Conversely, neighborhood commissioner Paula Edwards noted the mixed reactions in her community, emphasizing that while some residents are welcoming of the troops' help, others find their presence unsettling.

Local officials are drawing a delicate line; they acknowledge the benefits of the Guard’s assistance while also opposing the deployment. Many fear that by accepting help, they might inadvertently endorse the federal government’s broad interventionist strategies.

The military presence in D.C. has spurred legal challenges and ongoing discussions about autonomy and security. In Ward 8, a historically underserved area, community leaders are collaborating with the D.C. Guard on improvement projects while grappling with the complicated implications of military involvement in civilian life.

Brig. Gen. Leland Blanchard II of the D.C. Guard stressed that their focus remains on enriching the community, stating, We absolutely want to continue to partner with our own city, our own people here in the District of Columbia.”

As the situation evolves, D.C. residents continue to navigate their feelings about the Guard’s presence and the ongoing implications for local governance.