Amid pledges to overhaul immigration enforcement, a few months into Donald Trump’s presidency, the narrative surrounding those targeted by Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) has become increasingly complex. The president had promised a significant crackdown, inspiring both hope and fear among various communities across the U.S.

Polls indicate that this aggressive stance found support among many Americans, particularly among legal immigrants concerned about illegal entries into the country. Over time, however, the government expanded its focus under Trump to include a wider range of individuals, impacting not just criminals, but also migrant workers, activists, and tourists.

Reports show that as of June, approximately 51,000 undocumented migrants were documented in ICE detention, a record high. The administration initially claimed that their operations targeted only serious offenders, yet data from the Transactional Records Access Clearinghouse indicates that around 44% of detained individuals had no criminal record beyond their immigration status. Prominent dissent has emerged in places like Los Angeles, where protests erupted in response to ICE raids that apprehended individuals, including those with clean backgrounds.

Among notable arrests, some tourists have encountered immigration issues. For example, an Italian TikTok star and a Welsh tourist faced detention over visa complications. The cases spurred wider concerns regarding the treatment and rights of international visitors.

Significant attention has also turned to political activism among foreign nationals, as several students participating in protests have been detained. Reports reveal that over 1,600 international student visas were revoked, linked to their involvement in protests against U.S. policies. Prominent cases have highlighted the vulnerability of individuals who face deportation, even when holding permanent residency.

The narrative around deportations extends internationally, with reports emerging from El Salvador regarding alleged gang affiliations among those deported by the U.S. government. Family members of potential gang members assert their innocence, echoing criticisms about the inhumane methods of immigration enforcement.

As the administration justifies its actions citing national security concerns, advocacy groups voice alarm over potential abuses of power. With the backdrop of widespread uproar and legal challenges, the contours of U.S immigration policy remain in a state of evolving tension, reflecting deep divides within the nation’s approach to immigration and enforcement.