The ocean has always been a big part of Glen Butler's life. He's been a surfer for 50 years and, in that time, he says he rarely thought about sharks.
You're aware you're stepping into their environment, so you're cautious, the 61-year-old told the BBC.
But Mr Butler's confidence on the water was shattered last month when fellow surfer Mercury Psillakis was killed by a great white shark at Long Reef in Sydney.
It's shaken us up a bit, he admits. The incident has sparked a renewed debate about how to keep beachgoers safe in Australia's waters, particularly concerning the controversial shark nets used by New South Wales authorities.
Shark nets, which have been deployed since 1937, are intended to intercept sharks during hunts, but critics argue they inflict significant harm on non-target marine species, including endangered species and large mammals.
Environmental experts claim that inadequate safety measures could mislead beachgoers into feeling safe, thereby increasing risks, while others attribute the rise in shark sightings to increasing numbers of people in the water.
Despite the dangers, it's reported that nearly 80% of the Australian population engages with their coastal waters daily.
Following Psillakis' death, plans to trial the removal of shark nets at some Sydney beaches were suspended, leaving many wondering how to balance human safety with environmental conservation.
In response to increasing attacks, alternatives to traditional shark nets are being explored, including drone surveillance and smart drumlines. Advocates for these modern methods argue that they provide better protection for swimmers while minimizing harm to marine life.
As debates continue, the Australian government faces pressure to reassess its shark safety protocols while addressing community concerns.