Skip to main content
WorldVoice 360
PoliticsUnited States, Rwanda, United Kingdom

Lessons from Britain's Costly Deportation Attempt for U.S. Administration

As the U.S. considers deporting migrants to Rwanda, insights from the UK's struggles could provide vital guidance on the implications of such deals.

By Lizzie DeardenSource: nytimes.com1 min read
Lessons from Britain's Costly Deportation Attempt for U.S. Administration
Image via nytimes.com

In brief

Rwanda's recent discussions with the Trump administration regarding the intake of U.S. deported migrants echo the failed British migration policy, which incurred massive costs without achieving its intended goals.

In a striking development, Rwanda's foreign minister announced that the country is currently engaged in preliminary talks with the Trump administration about an agreement to accept migrants expelled from the U.S. This situation has drawn comparisons to Britain's contentious past policy, where the Conservative government previously secured a deal in 2022 to deport asylum seekers to Rwanda. However, after two years of attempts and an expenditure of hundreds of millions of pounds, the initiative ultimately faltered, leading to its abandonment by the new Labour government.Britain's experience can serve as a cautionary tale for the U.S. administration. The initial costs of the British plan reached an astounding £715 million (around $955 million), far exceeding expectations while contributing little to the intended deterrent effect on illegal migration. The funds allocated included £290 million paid directly to Rwanda, alongside significant expenditures on preparatory flights, detention facilities, IT infrastructure, and legal consultations. Ultimately, only four migrants were sent to Rwanda, and those were voluntary, incentivized by payments of £3,000 each.Further documents reveal that these numbers represent a mere fraction of what the British government had anticipated it would spend had the agreement fully materialized. For each deportee, the UK had consented to pay Rwanda £150,000, funding what was conceived as a comprehensive five-year "integration package" including lodging, nourishment, healthcare, and education for the relocated individuals. Given the stark reality of Britain's failed approach, the Trump administration would be prudent to weigh these lessons seriously before moving forward with a similar course of action.

Topics

More on this story