Wisconsin Judge Faces Plea Negotiations Amid Controversial Immigration Case

Wed Nov 19 2025 02:32:57 GMT+0200 (Eastern European Standard Time)

Milwaukee County Judge Hannah Dugan is involved in plea negotiations as she faces charges for allegedly aiding an undocumented immigrant evade deportation, linked to a broader immigration crackdown initiated by the Trump administration.

Plea negotiations are underway for Milwaukee County Judge Hannah Dugan, indicted for obstructing federal agents attempting to apprehend an undocumented immigrant. Dugan's actions have sparked significant controversy as they reflect ongoing tensions between local authorities and federal immigration policies. While her defense maintains her innocence and readiness for trial, discussions with prosecutors could change the trajectory of the case, which is set to commence in December.

MADISON, Wis. (AP) — Plea negotiations continue for Wisconsin Judge Hannah Dugan, accused of helping an undocumented immigrant evade federal agents. Interim U.S. Attorney Brad Schimel indicated that discussions on a possible resolution are underway, although Dugan's legal team has not shown willingness to accept any proposals.

This case has emerged as a critical touchpoint in the national dialogue surrounding immigration enforcement policies championed during the Trump administration. Schimel regards the plea negotiations as a standard practice aimed at resolving cases efficiently and minimizing risks for both parties involved.

Dugan's lawyers maintain her innocence and preparations for the upcoming trial are robust, scheduled for December. The charges stem from an incident in April, where federal agents arrived at the Milwaukee County Courthouse to arrest Eduardo Flores-Ruiz, an undocumented immigrant who had an appointment in Dugan's courtroom. Allegedly aware of the agents’ presence, Dugan facilitated Flores-Ruiz's exit through a private entrance. Following a brief foot chase outside, federal agents apprehended him.

The situation escalated significantly after Dugan was indicted for obstruction and concealing an individual to prevent arrest. If convicted, she could face up to six years in prison.

The case highlights the tensions between the Trump administration's aggressive immigration stance and local officials' responses, raising concerns among Democrats who allege that Dugan has been made an example of to deter opposition.

Intense scrutiny surrounds the administration's public vilification of Dugan, paralleled by official commentary that brands her as an 'activist judge.' Following the indictment, U.S. Attorney General Pamela Bondi appointed Schimel to lead the prosecution, and experts suggest that the Justice Department's directives could limit the avenues for a plea deal.

While preliminary negotiations might occur, many believe the political ramifications and federal pressures could leave little room for an amicable resolution before the trial commences.