The ECHR acknowledged a violation of Semenya’s rights based on the Swiss court's inadequate review process. Although the ruling suggests a pathway for potential future hearings on her case, it does not immediately alter the existing restrictions that prevent her participation in elite female athletics. In an emotional response, Semenya expressed hope, stating that the decision is about more than her competition—it emphasizes human rights and athlete protection.

Despite the ruling offering a glimpse of justice, it ultimately does not change the current status imposed by World Athletics, which argues that such regulations are necessary to ensure fair play. The sporting body plans to introduce DNA tests to verify biological sex, stirring further debate on fair competition in women's sports.

This complicated scenario underscores the ongoing tensions between athletic regulations and human rights, as Semenya continues her fight for equality and recognition in the world of sports. As she shifts her focus towards advocacy, Semenya remains a pivotal figure in the conversation about DSD athletes and fairness in competition, as well as the broader implications of the ECHR's ruling in the realm of international sports governance.