NEW YORK (AP) — There is a sense of optimism in the New York courtroom as the pretrial hearing for Luigi Mangione inches closer to conclusion, with a judge indicating that the proceedings could wrap up by the end of the week. This hearing relates to the murder case of UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson.
Judge Gregory Carro mentioned on Tuesday, after three weeks of testimony, that he hopes to finalize the hearing proceedings by Thursday.
Luigi Mangione, 27, is facing serious charges, having pleaded not guilty to both state and federal murder counts. He seeks to exclude critical evidence gathered during his arrest on December 9, 2024, in Altoona, Pennsylvania, which includes a firearm and a notebook allegedly tying him to Thompson's homicide just five days earlier in Manhattan.
The prosecution has called over a dozen witnesses thus far, with anticipation of further testimony expected after a brief hiatus on Wednesday.
On Tuesday, the court featured testimony from various key figures, including a police evidence custodian, a homicide commander from New York City, and an investigative analyst from the Manhattan district attorney’s office.
The unfolding situation began when Mangione was spotted by patrons at a McDonald's in Altoona, roughly 230 miles from Manhattan. Reports suggest that a manager contacted law enforcement, noting concerns that he resembled the suspect in the CEO's murder.
The defense's argument centers around the legality of the search—asserting that evidence taken from Mangione's backpack should be inadmissible since they claim the police did not have a warrant nor valid grounds for a search without one.
However, the prosecution counters that the search was legal, executed in conjunction with his arrest while ensuring there were no dangerous items that could endanger the officers or the public. The evidence collected includes a 9 mm firearm, which is claimed to match the type used to kill Thompson, along with a notebook that seemingly details intentions against a health insurance executive.
As the pretrial progresses, the court's focus remains on how this evidence will be treated in court, shifting the spotlight to the outcomes of upcoming testimonies and strategic defenses as both sides battle over the narrative and interpretation of events surrounding this high-profile case.




















