Earlier this month, a Palestinian diplomat called Husam Zomlot was invited to a discussion at the Chatham House think tank in London. Belgium had just joined the UK, France, and other countries in promising to recognise a Palestinian state at the United Nations in New York. Zomlot highlighted the significance of this moment, suggesting it might be the last viable attempt at implementing the two-state solution. Weeks later, the UK, Canada, and Australia confirmed this step, prompting UK politician Sir Keir Starmer to emphasize the importance of a secure Israel alongside a viable Palestinian state.

With over 150 nations already recognizing Palestine, the recent endorsements by traditional allies of Israel mark a turning point. However, the challenges of defining Palestinian statehood remain, particularly when considering the requirements of a defined territory, a permanent population, and a functioning government.

The historical context reveals that the Palestinians dream of a state encompassing East Jerusalem, the West Bank, and Gaza Strip, areas captured by Israel during the 1967 Six-Day War. Geographic and political fragmentation complicates this vision, notably since the Israeli military governs significant areas of the West Bank, affecting the Palestinians' administrative capabilities.

Furthermore, the ongoing conflict in Gaza, with the humanitarian toll evident, has led to the Palestinian Authority appearing increasingly helpless. The leadership crisis is compounded by the division between the Palestinian Authority in the West Bank and Hamas in Gaza, with public sentiment voicing a desire for new leadership. With Mahmoud Abbas nearing 90 years of age and the last elections held in 2006, calls for change resonate more than ever.

Marwan Barghouti emerges as a potential leader, desired by many, despite being imprisoned for years. Polls suggest that he could win a majority, reflecting a public disillusionment with the current leadership. However, Israeli resistance to Barghouti's release complicates his prospects as a unifying figure.

The international landscape too plays a critical role, with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's opposition to Palestinian statehood solid and the U.S. showing mixed signals regarding Palestinian governance. In this context, the recognition of Palestinian statehood, while symbolic, could pave the way for changes if backed by genuine commitment from international allies to facilitate peace and support governance efforts within Palestine.

However, the complexity of the situation necessitates not merely recognition but actionable, timely steps towards a sustainable, unified leadership that can effectively navigate the challenges ahead.