Iliescu's political journey began amid the turmoil of the December 1989 revolution, a period he initially navigated as a stabilizing force. His leadership advanced wide-reaching reforms, yet it was simultaneously marred by controversial actions, including the suppression of protests and a failure to completely distance himself from remnants of the former communist regime. Investigations into his alleged involvement in violent incidents have left an indelible mark on Romania’s contemporary history and politics.

Born on March 3, 1930, in Oltenita, Iliescu's early political inclinations developed during his engineering studies in Moscow. His return to Romania saw a rapid ascent through the Communist Party, though he would later face marginalization under Nicolae Ceausescu due to his reformist views. After nearly a decade away from politics, his reemergence during the 1989 revolution was controversial—some considered him an opportunist, while others hailed him as a unifying figure amidst chaos.

As head of the National Salvation Front (FSN), he became Romania's interim president, leading the country through the collapse of the Ceaușescu regime. Subsequently, he won the first democratic elections in 50 years in 1990, capturing 85% of the vote. However, his presidency was characterized by brutal responses to dissent, particularly during protests and the Mineriads, which resulted in significant violence.

Iliescu served multiple terms, with his governance marked by both economic reforms and persistent challenges. Critics argue that his failure to confront deep-rooted corruption and justice reforms paved the way for ongoing political struggles in Romania. While his time in office saw significant steps towards Western integration, questions about his role in historical violence persisted, notably leading to an indictment for crimes against humanity in 2017.

In his later years, although he withdrew from the public eye, he remained an influential figure within the Social Democratic Party (PSD). His nuanced impact on Romania continues to resonate, prompting discussions about the balance between historical influence and moral responsibility in leadership. Despite his controversial legacy, Iliescu's role in shaping modern Romania as both a democratic nation and a society grappling with its communist past will forever remain a complex chapter in the country’s history.