TEL AVIV, Israel (AP) — The conflict in the Gaza Strip is beginning to garner different treatment in Israeli news coverage. Historically, television channels in Israel have focused predominantly on national defense narratives, showcasing acts of heroism, the plight of hostages, and the casualties of Israeli soldiers. However, in recent months, some Israeli networks have opted to display harrowing imagery of malnourished children and deeper investigations into the daily struggles faced by Palestinians.
This gradual change appears to be a response to universal condemnation of the ongoing military actions, creating significant internal discourse about the legitimacy and consequences of Israel's offensive. It’s not just about being compassionate towards Gaza but scrutinizing our actions in this war from an Israeli viewpoint, notes communications professor Eran Amsalem of Hebrew University.
Despite the rise of public awareness and protests advocating for hostages' return, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has largely overlooked these movements. Following the attack by Hamas on October 7, 2023, which resulted in substantial casualties, the media's focus initially lingered on Israel’s homefront trauma, rather than the repercussions in Gaza.
Raviv Drucker, a prominent news anchor, commented on the lack of prior coverage of Gaza’s suffering: The Israeli media primarily reported events from an Israeli-centric perspective, assessing the war's effectiveness from a defensive standpoint. Additionally, the Israeli military's restrictions on international journalists have stifled independent reporting, with the U.S.-based Committee to Protect Journalists highlighting the deadly risks for reporters in the region.
The prioritization of narratives regarding Palestinian suffering has not been without backlash. Well-known news anchor Yonit Levi faced considerable criticism for stating that the international perception of Israel's actions reflected a moral failure rather than a diplomatic one. Furthermore, some journalists have even expressed approval of civilian casualties in Israeli operations. Despite controversies, there are signs of growing dialogues around the hardships faced by Gazans in mainstream media, which continue to feature human stories, albeit reluctantly and under pressure.
In conclusion, while the Israeli media landscape still skews towards nationalistic storytelling, a small, yet significant pivot towards acknowledging the humanitarian crisis in Gaza suggests a potential evolution in reporting under pressure from both global and domestic audiences.
This gradual change appears to be a response to universal condemnation of the ongoing military actions, creating significant internal discourse about the legitimacy and consequences of Israel's offensive. It’s not just about being compassionate towards Gaza but scrutinizing our actions in this war from an Israeli viewpoint, notes communications professor Eran Amsalem of Hebrew University.
Despite the rise of public awareness and protests advocating for hostages' return, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has largely overlooked these movements. Following the attack by Hamas on October 7, 2023, which resulted in substantial casualties, the media's focus initially lingered on Israel’s homefront trauma, rather than the repercussions in Gaza.
Raviv Drucker, a prominent news anchor, commented on the lack of prior coverage of Gaza’s suffering: The Israeli media primarily reported events from an Israeli-centric perspective, assessing the war's effectiveness from a defensive standpoint. Additionally, the Israeli military's restrictions on international journalists have stifled independent reporting, with the U.S.-based Committee to Protect Journalists highlighting the deadly risks for reporters in the region.
The prioritization of narratives regarding Palestinian suffering has not been without backlash. Well-known news anchor Yonit Levi faced considerable criticism for stating that the international perception of Israel's actions reflected a moral failure rather than a diplomatic one. Furthermore, some journalists have even expressed approval of civilian casualties in Israeli operations. Despite controversies, there are signs of growing dialogues around the hardships faced by Gazans in mainstream media, which continue to feature human stories, albeit reluctantly and under pressure.
In conclusion, while the Israeli media landscape still skews towards nationalistic storytelling, a small, yet significant pivot towards acknowledging the humanitarian crisis in Gaza suggests a potential evolution in reporting under pressure from both global and domestic audiences.
